Quick summary: ATS software parses your resume into structured data before a recruiter ever searches it. Simple, single-column formatting with standard section headings survives that parsing reliably; multi-column layouts, tables, and text in headers often don’t. Mirror the job posting’s exact language for skills you genuinely have — don’t invent ones you don’t.
Most mid-size and large companies now run every resume through an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) before a human ever sees it. A resume that looks great to a person can still get auto-filtered out if it’s not formatted in a way the software can reliably read. Here’s how to avoid that, and what actually matters once it does reach a human.
How ATS software actually reads your resume
ATS tools parse your resume into a structured record — extracting your work history, dates, job titles, and skills into distinct fields — so recruiters can later search and filter candidates by keyword. If the software can’t correctly parse a section of your resume, that information effectively doesn’t exist to a recruiter searching for it, even though it’s clearly visible on the page to a human reading it directly.
This is the core reason format matters as much as content for getting past this first stage: a beautifully designed resume that an ATS parses incorrectly can score worse than a plain one it reads cleanly.
Formatting choices that cause real parsing problems
Certain common design choices — often the ones that make a resume look more visually polished — are exactly what tends to break automated parsing, depending on the specific ATS a company uses:
- Multi-column layouts, where the software may read across columns instead of down them, scrambling the order of your information
- Text placed inside tables, text boxes, or graphics, which many parsers skip entirely rather than extract
- Contact information placed in a header or footer, which some ATS platforms don’t scan at all
- Unusual or decorative fonts that can render as garbled characters once parsed
A single-column layout with standard, plainly labeled section headings (“Experience,” “Education,” “Skills”) in a standard, widely supported font is the safest structural choice. It’s less visually distinctive than a designed template, but it’s the version most likely to actually reach a human reader in the first place — which matters more than visual polish if the alternative is being filtered out before anyone sees it.
Keywords matter, but copy-pasting the job description doesn’t work
Recruiters search their ATS by specific skills and job titles relevant to the role they’re filling. Read the actual job posting closely and mirror the specific terms it uses — if the posting says “stakeholder management” and that’s genuinely something you’ve done, use that exact phrase rather than a rough synonym like “working with clients,” since the search is often literal.
That said, don’t add skills or terms you don’t actually have just to match keywords. It might get your resume through the initial filter, but it catches up with you quickly in an interview when you’re asked to elaborate on something you can’t actually speak to — and that costs more credibility than a filtered-out application ever would.
A simple test before you submit
Here’s a quick, practical check anyone can do before submitting: copy your resume’s full text and paste it into a plain text editor (like Notepad or TextEdit), stripped of all formatting. If the information comes out in a garbled, out-of-order mess, an ATS is likely to have a similar problem parsing the original. If it reads cleanly, top to bottom, in the correct logical order, you’re in good structural shape — from there, the rest comes down to the actual content and how well it matches the role.
Common mistakes people make with ATS-targeted resumes
- Using a visually elaborate template without testing how it parses. Many free resume templates prioritize visual design over ATS compatibility — check before committing to one for an application that matters.
- Keyword-stuffing without genuine relevance. Repeating terms unnaturally, or listing skills you can’t actually back up, tends to backfire once a human reviews the resume that made it through.
- Assuming one resume version fits every application. Tailoring the specific language to each job posting’s actual wording measurably improves how well an ATS matches you to that particular role.
FAQ
Should I include a resume “objective” statement?
Most modern guidance skips this in favor of a brief, specific summary of your relevant experience — objective statements tend to state the obvious (that you want the job) without adding information a recruiter or ATS can actually use.
Do ATS systems penalize resumes over one page?
Not directly — length itself usually isn’t what an ATS filters on. That said, a page limit is often still a strong idea for human readability once your resume passes the initial automated stage, especially earlier in a career.
Is a PDF or a Word document safer for ATS parsing?
This varies by which specific ATS a company uses, and both formats can parse well or poorly depending on how the file itself was built (for example, a PDF exported from a design tool with text-as-image elements can parse very poorly). When a job posting specifies a preferred format, follow that directly; otherwise, a simply formatted Word document is often the safest general default.
Related reading
See our Career category for interview prep and job search guides as we publish them.